Software SCSI drivers (like for HP B Series).H/W vendor support for various server hardware subsystems like: You could debate individual design decisions though but it's hard to say that one overall is better than the other.Īfter many years using both, I can say that the real differences are: Both package managers are now quite mature and have roughly equivalent features. Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora are based on the Red Hat Linux package management system, RPM. Ubuntu is based on Debian's package manager APT and DPKG. This would expand your scope to include distributions like SUSE, Mandriva, PCLinuxOS, and their derivatives. RPM-based distributions in general - that is, distributions that use the Redhat Package Management system. They do all share the same package manager as I talk about below, but the differences between them are greater than the difference between their package manager and Ubuntu's. It's actually very hard to compare Ubuntu against all those (RHEL, CentOS and Fedora) as if they are one thing, because they are all very different in themselves. You can, however, get basically the same distribution, but without the commercial contract, for free in the form of the CentOS distribution.ĭistributions which are based on or inherit from Red Hat, which would also include CentOS and Fedora, and their derivatives. Red-hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) - A specific, commercial distribution by Red Hat.īy far the biggest difference between Ubuntu and RHEL is the license terms - Red Hat Enterprise Linux is commercial. There are a few different ways to interpret "Redhat" here:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |